So what can we learn from these 4 conflicted characters from the Bible? We learn that there is no sin that God cannot forgive and that there is no past mistake that cannot be undone and there is no sinner that cannot still do great things. Accept the gift of Christ and let the Holy Spirit do the rest, let’s pray!
The Travelling Preacher Teacher
Monday, 14 October 2013
Our past is done, our mistakes no more, we are free!
So what can we learn from these 4 conflicted characters from the Bible? We learn that there is no sin that God cannot forgive and that there is no past mistake that cannot be undone and there is no sinner that cannot still do great things. Accept the gift of Christ and let the Holy Spirit do the rest, let’s pray!
Monday, 26 August 2013
Healing and our Call to Evangelism
Wednesday, 31 July 2013
The incorporeality of God
This is a very simple sermon this week. Forgive me for my late
writings. After my sermon on James I had to prepare to go on sabbatical
and move country and have currently moved to Canada, not sure where God
will put us next, perhaps a stint of short term missions trips; while we
were not officially working under the banner of a church as
missionaries we tried to be domestic missionaries in our work places as
Christ called us to be. This online message deals with a topic that is
generally accepted by all those of the Abrahamic faiths; the lack of a
corporeal nature to God. To have a corporeal nature is limiting, it is
finite. As one priest once said when you have something with a body, you
can escape from it; it is trapped. Truly people who have witnessed
loved ones trapped in an ailing body consider it a gift or a blessing
when they are freed from it. But what does it mean for us as Christians
that our God is without form, as the Old Testament says is unseen, and
is in all places. We will be looking at this in 3 parts, the first being
what is said of God’s lack of physical nature in the Old Testament even
when it describes Him in the way of feet and hands. The second part we
will look at; seems to be the exact contradiction of God incorporeality,
being Christ Jesus, and the third part the concept of the Holy Spirit,
and what does the Bible say about Him?
As I write this message I am struggling to find work. It seems that there is always unseen forces against me, but on the other side I am reminded of the verse in Isaiah when Elijah is looking for the Lord and he finds Him in the mountain as a still, small voice. When I was traveling through Europe I arrived at Westminster Abbey. And in Westminster it states what is its principles, one of which being that God is a Spirit without form whether it be physical or material. In Judaism they believe that God is neither physical nor spiritual but a third option that we are not yes familiar with. Reference to God appearing as a spirit or His Spirit is referenced at least 20 times in the Old Testament, beginning in the book of Genesis. What is interesting is that God forbids creating an image of Him as He communicates through a pillar of fire to Moses. The Holy Spirit itself is mentioned several times in the Bible, specifically the Old Testament; but as a kid once asked me at church if we were made in God’s image doesn’t he have a body? In the Old Testament the prophet even says that he saw God face to face; and as early as Genesis we have written examples of the hand of God, His feet, what do these things mean? Saint Augustine said it best and I am paraphrasing, I do not think about you o Lord as one who has feet and hands and the anatomy of man but am aware that you are a spirit. However we also recognize that to communicate to man is sometimes beneficial as a man. This brings me to my next point, the corporeality that is Christ Jesus.
Often times the reason Christianity is rejected is because our two Abrahamic cousins take exception to idea of a Son of God. Even denominations in our own religion take exception to this concept as Jesus being begotten and not created by the Father. The question arises why if God is a non-corporeal being would He come to earth as a man in a backwater town in Palestine? Now in Judaism they say for example God walking in the garden of Eden would just be figures of speech, in the same way we are made in God’s image we do not physically represent the face of God. But why then would Christ come? I believe there are several reasons for it. First being that since God the Father is out of time and space as mentioned in previous sermons He could not go against Himself and change His nature. In Hebrews it says that Jesus is the exact representation of God. I believe that God knows what man needed for this gap to be bridged, a human body; was Christ really sitting at the right hand, perhaps that is a figure of speech but we do know that we needed a human sacrifice, a perfect man to atone for our sins; but only One is perfect. But the nature of God that is Christ again started off as a Spirit as well so it is not actually contradictory with the unseen God; it would be contradictory if Christ became the anointed Son of God after His conception, like some sects believe when he was baptized; then this would be going against the incorporeal God.
The last point I would like to address is the Holy Spirit. God’s incorporeal nature is summed up in the Holy Spirit. Many writers say that the Old Testament is the record of the Father, the Gospels were the record of the Son and the letters were that of the Spirit. The Spirit is not only God but it is the portion of God that lives in us. In all other religions where the God has a material body they are not able to penetrate the very heart of the believer but God’s Spirit does. It’s nature is truth, conviction, and regeneration. God could not do that if He was purely a corporeal being, Christ is just one of His natures. Well I guess it is time to wrap this up. I have decided to take a break from the attributes of God series. I feel that I am on a different spiritual journey and so I will put apologetics on the back burner and work on sermons focusing on more emotionally heavy issues. If I feel God calling me back to this I will begin writing sermons on theological issues again. But if you are reading this I encourage you to investigate deeper the nature of God and other such issues. Well that’s all for me, I am signing off for now. I will begin a new sermon series this week called “The Still Small Voice” focusing on different scenario’s God speaks to us on. God bless you.
As I write this message I am struggling to find work. It seems that there is always unseen forces against me, but on the other side I am reminded of the verse in Isaiah when Elijah is looking for the Lord and he finds Him in the mountain as a still, small voice. When I was traveling through Europe I arrived at Westminster Abbey. And in Westminster it states what is its principles, one of which being that God is a Spirit without form whether it be physical or material. In Judaism they believe that God is neither physical nor spiritual but a third option that we are not yes familiar with. Reference to God appearing as a spirit or His Spirit is referenced at least 20 times in the Old Testament, beginning in the book of Genesis. What is interesting is that God forbids creating an image of Him as He communicates through a pillar of fire to Moses. The Holy Spirit itself is mentioned several times in the Bible, specifically the Old Testament; but as a kid once asked me at church if we were made in God’s image doesn’t he have a body? In the Old Testament the prophet even says that he saw God face to face; and as early as Genesis we have written examples of the hand of God, His feet, what do these things mean? Saint Augustine said it best and I am paraphrasing, I do not think about you o Lord as one who has feet and hands and the anatomy of man but am aware that you are a spirit. However we also recognize that to communicate to man is sometimes beneficial as a man. This brings me to my next point, the corporeality that is Christ Jesus.
Often times the reason Christianity is rejected is because our two Abrahamic cousins take exception to idea of a Son of God. Even denominations in our own religion take exception to this concept as Jesus being begotten and not created by the Father. The question arises why if God is a non-corporeal being would He come to earth as a man in a backwater town in Palestine? Now in Judaism they say for example God walking in the garden of Eden would just be figures of speech, in the same way we are made in God’s image we do not physically represent the face of God. But why then would Christ come? I believe there are several reasons for it. First being that since God the Father is out of time and space as mentioned in previous sermons He could not go against Himself and change His nature. In Hebrews it says that Jesus is the exact representation of God. I believe that God knows what man needed for this gap to be bridged, a human body; was Christ really sitting at the right hand, perhaps that is a figure of speech but we do know that we needed a human sacrifice, a perfect man to atone for our sins; but only One is perfect. But the nature of God that is Christ again started off as a Spirit as well so it is not actually contradictory with the unseen God; it would be contradictory if Christ became the anointed Son of God after His conception, like some sects believe when he was baptized; then this would be going against the incorporeal God.
The last point I would like to address is the Holy Spirit. God’s incorporeal nature is summed up in the Holy Spirit. Many writers say that the Old Testament is the record of the Father, the Gospels were the record of the Son and the letters were that of the Spirit. The Spirit is not only God but it is the portion of God that lives in us. In all other religions where the God has a material body they are not able to penetrate the very heart of the believer but God’s Spirit does. It’s nature is truth, conviction, and regeneration. God could not do that if He was purely a corporeal being, Christ is just one of His natures. Well I guess it is time to wrap this up. I have decided to take a break from the attributes of God series. I feel that I am on a different spiritual journey and so I will put apologetics on the back burner and work on sermons focusing on more emotionally heavy issues. If I feel God calling me back to this I will begin writing sermons on theological issues again. But if you are reading this I encourage you to investigate deeper the nature of God and other such issues. Well that’s all for me, I am signing off for now. I will begin a new sermon series this week called “The Still Small Voice” focusing on different scenario’s God speaks to us on. God bless you.
Sunday, 30 June 2013
Where does our wisdom come from?
This week we are looking at James 3: 13-18. James is questioning where does our wisdom come from? In Proverbs we read that the beginning of wisdom is fear (respectful awareness and awe) of the Lord. But that can be accused of being a very vague statement. One of the reasons I love the epistles is that the apostles were so explicit in their teachings. So we are going to separate and examine the verses in 3 different sections, the first being verses 13-14, the second being the 15th-16th verses, and the third being the 17th-18th verses. The first section of these verses is what I call the “Challenge.” James’ blunt nature and frank discussions calls Messianic Christians on their behaviour that he has been seeing since the recent formation of the Church. The 2nd section I call the “Warning” section. Here James is laying out plainly what the wisdom from below looks like, what it can do to us, what our motivations are, and warns that the followers of Christ have the potential for both the wisdom from heaven and the wisdom from hell! The 3rd and final segment and section of this scripture is the “Exhortation and Encouragement” section. James has shocked the Messianic Christians, he has warned them, and now he gives them hope. Human beings are extremely hard headed people and it is only when we are stripped and broken down that we are open to the refining fire of the Holy Spirit and that is why St. James has written this portion of the letter in this way.
So let us begin on this journey together, let us look at verses 13-14, the “Challenge.” In Biblical and modern culture we have people who are called “pharisaic.” They speak in one way when watched and act another in private; we may call them hypocrites. When James wrote this letter to the Church they were still so young, and older beliefs, customs, and religious sects were infiltrating the pure message of the Messiah, leading them astray. James says to us that if you claim to have this heavenly wisdom you need to show it. Not just in public but in your private life. My friends’ wife had a grandmother was a devoted Christian all her life and who she was in private was the same person she was in her public and professional life. And James challenges us, he says that if you are not like this; if you have sinful, personal motivations, and are a slave to evil desires do not be happy about this; do not boast about how you have been these things, and certainly do not lie about it. James is telling the Messianic Christians if you have sin, hidden, deep dark sin, do not hide it, bring it to the light of God, confess it, and face the truth! When I was a younger man I used to justify and hide the wrong things I did, while you may be forgiven by God for those sins, you never mentally recover completely this way and are certainly never able to move on! Our society teaches us this this hide and dash trick and the results are often hidden sins, disgraceful shames, and empty searches for meaningless idols to fill the hurting holes in our souls.
Our Lord Jesus commanded honesty and bravery, even if facing our darkest desires strikes fear into our hearts. And this is the central theme behind James’ challenge
The second section of the scriptures this week focuses on what I call the “Warning.” The “Warning” is very much the effect of the cause and effect relationship that results from sourcing one wisdom instead of another. In our relationships we have results that come from whichever wisdom we follow. Now we need to be clear as Christians, we do not subscribe solely to one wisdom or the other but often times as humans bounce between both. But often in our relationships when we indulge the wisdom of hell, the consequences can be disastrous for our relationships. James says every evil can come from this demonic wisdom and disorder, chaos is the natural effect to follow. In the original Greek the word for wisdom that James uses is the same word we would associate for life change or the philosophical path one may follow; so it is not a concept that is abstract or distant, it is very much an idea we should adhere to, follow the ways of God and His wisdom, or commit idolatry and follow Satan’s wisdom. A mate of mine was once married; he’s been divorced now for several years. There were mistakes on both sides of the marriage, but his wife had done something pretty severe; and my mate is probably one of the most forgiving men I’ve ever met but he couldn’t allow himself to forgive her because she kept trying to justify what she did, she kept trying to shift the blame. As my wife calls it, sorry with a “but.” Here’s the danger, if we cannot admit what we have done and ask for pure, unbridled forgiveness we have not humbled ourselves and as James says, we are not peace loving, humble, or submissive, and we are then not reflecting the true nature of Christ.
How are we feeling? Sombre? Low? Humbled? I was when I really began to study this passage. However the younger brother of Christ offers us a hand, just like his Brother did. He guides us into the section I call “Exhortations and Encouragements.” He shows us what we need to do to gain that heavenly wisdom and to demonstrate that we have gained it. He tells us brothers and sisters’ heavenly wisdom is pure, if it isn’t pure, it isn’t from God! It is also peace loving, submissive, humble, considerate, full of spiritual fruit (meaning that God’s good works are evident), impartial, and sincere. James is saying if you consistently source wisdom from God that this is the bi-product of that wisdom and the effect of this cause is that you will sow a harvest of righteousness. See this was the difference between what Christ offered and what the other “saviours” of the time did. He offered-and his apostles continued that teaching, a way out of hell. Many “saviours”, self-helpers, guru’s, and religious enlightened ones will always tells us of what we are doing wrong, what we’re not supposed to be doing; Rules, regulations, and a possible hope for a select few; but Christ Jesus and the Spirit of God, the Great Councillor warned us like all the others of our sins but unlike any of the others showed the right true path without partiality and with most sincere love. And that is what James is doing for the Messianic Christians right now in this text; what he is calling them to, and it is what the Spirit of the Lord is instilling in us now.
So let us begin on this journey together, let us look at verses 13-14, the “Challenge.” In Biblical and modern culture we have people who are called “pharisaic.” They speak in one way when watched and act another in private; we may call them hypocrites. When James wrote this letter to the Church they were still so young, and older beliefs, customs, and religious sects were infiltrating the pure message of the Messiah, leading them astray. James says to us that if you claim to have this heavenly wisdom you need to show it. Not just in public but in your private life. My friends’ wife had a grandmother was a devoted Christian all her life and who she was in private was the same person she was in her public and professional life. And James challenges us, he says that if you are not like this; if you have sinful, personal motivations, and are a slave to evil desires do not be happy about this; do not boast about how you have been these things, and certainly do not lie about it. James is telling the Messianic Christians if you have sin, hidden, deep dark sin, do not hide it, bring it to the light of God, confess it, and face the truth! When I was a younger man I used to justify and hide the wrong things I did, while you may be forgiven by God for those sins, you never mentally recover completely this way and are certainly never able to move on! Our society teaches us this this hide and dash trick and the results are often hidden sins, disgraceful shames, and empty searches for meaningless idols to fill the hurting holes in our souls.
Our Lord Jesus commanded honesty and bravery, even if facing our darkest desires strikes fear into our hearts. And this is the central theme behind James’ challenge
The second section of the scriptures this week focuses on what I call the “Warning.” The “Warning” is very much the effect of the cause and effect relationship that results from sourcing one wisdom instead of another. In our relationships we have results that come from whichever wisdom we follow. Now we need to be clear as Christians, we do not subscribe solely to one wisdom or the other but often times as humans bounce between both. But often in our relationships when we indulge the wisdom of hell, the consequences can be disastrous for our relationships. James says every evil can come from this demonic wisdom and disorder, chaos is the natural effect to follow. In the original Greek the word for wisdom that James uses is the same word we would associate for life change or the philosophical path one may follow; so it is not a concept that is abstract or distant, it is very much an idea we should adhere to, follow the ways of God and His wisdom, or commit idolatry and follow Satan’s wisdom. A mate of mine was once married; he’s been divorced now for several years. There were mistakes on both sides of the marriage, but his wife had done something pretty severe; and my mate is probably one of the most forgiving men I’ve ever met but he couldn’t allow himself to forgive her because she kept trying to justify what she did, she kept trying to shift the blame. As my wife calls it, sorry with a “but.” Here’s the danger, if we cannot admit what we have done and ask for pure, unbridled forgiveness we have not humbled ourselves and as James says, we are not peace loving, humble, or submissive, and we are then not reflecting the true nature of Christ.
How are we feeling? Sombre? Low? Humbled? I was when I really began to study this passage. However the younger brother of Christ offers us a hand, just like his Brother did. He guides us into the section I call “Exhortations and Encouragements.” He shows us what we need to do to gain that heavenly wisdom and to demonstrate that we have gained it. He tells us brothers and sisters’ heavenly wisdom is pure, if it isn’t pure, it isn’t from God! It is also peace loving, submissive, humble, considerate, full of spiritual fruit (meaning that God’s good works are evident), impartial, and sincere. James is saying if you consistently source wisdom from God that this is the bi-product of that wisdom and the effect of this cause is that you will sow a harvest of righteousness. See this was the difference between what Christ offered and what the other “saviours” of the time did. He offered-and his apostles continued that teaching, a way out of hell. Many “saviours”, self-helpers, guru’s, and religious enlightened ones will always tells us of what we are doing wrong, what we’re not supposed to be doing; Rules, regulations, and a possible hope for a select few; but Christ Jesus and the Spirit of God, the Great Councillor warned us like all the others of our sins but unlike any of the others showed the right true path without partiality and with most sincere love. And that is what James is doing for the Messianic Christians right now in this text; what he is calling them to, and it is what the Spirit of the Lord is instilling in us now.
Saturday, 4 May 2013
The Impeccability of God
We are continuing with our sermon
series on the “Attributes of God.” I
apologise to online parishioners and readers for being so absent but other responsibilities
kept me away from sermon writing, I am definitely behind where I wanted us to
be in our journey through this but what can you do? I pray that everyone is doing well and
wherever you are in this world you are blessed and you feel the love of God in
you, around you, and on you-because God loves you.
This
sermon we are looking at the impeccability of God; Impeccability meaning,
perfect, without flaw or error. I
believe that this attribute best defines what God is, for no being can claim to
be God without being perfect. No being would
want to worship a God who was reactive, made errors, and sinned. One of the main tenets of Christianity is
that Christ was fully man and sinless but He was tempted and as such we can
have victory over sin because of Christ we can say we will be perfect. The Bible says “be perfect as Christ is
perfect.” The last sermon I wrote was on
the impassibility of God, and as I have said before God’s attributes cannot be
divided. You cannot have one and not
have the other. I don’t know about you
but not only do I find it comforting that God and thus Christ is perfect but
that there is no possibility of sin and because of that impeccability. We are going to be looking at God’s
perfection in 3 ways, first the proof that God must be impeccable because He
could be nothing but, secondly that Christ is impeccable because He is the
incarnate God, and third what does that mean for us as Christians, devout
followers of Christ.
People
often think God makes mistakes. I was
driving home one day and on a billboard of an Anglican church it said “many
people want to serve God but only as advisors.”
The reason people have trouble giving up control to the Lord is because
they cannot trust because they are afraid He will make a mistake! Psalm 18:30 says that God is perfect! He does not make a mistake. In ancient societies the gods of old could be
swayed and often made choices that human beings were disgusted with. Often times these ancient deities required sacrifices
that were extreme and the legends of their conduct read like a rated r
movie! A god should never be more sinful
that their creation. In today’s society
the three Abrahamic religions fight over many things but we thing we do not
fight about is that God is perfect. As
the Bible says that no one has goodness in them all goodness comes from God
(Ps.16:2). If something is the source of
all goodness it must be perfect. Rene Descartes
posed this logical proof for God’s perfection and existence. He said that God must exist for we are aware
of God’s perfection: He is the greatest
(most perfect) being, it is greater to exist than not to exist, and thus God
exists. Another proof of God’s
perfection is His holiness. God is
referred to many ways in the Bible but
the top two ways God is referred to is as a God of mercy and firstly a God of
holiness. God does not break His word
even when we make mistakes, thank Him-even at personal cost to Him. But the relationship we enjoy with God is not
evidence of His impeccability but that of Christ because if God had sent a mere
man to pay for our sins, he would have come up short in the bill but we needed
an impeccable man-we needed someone who had His foot in both worlds, the human
nature and temptations we endure and yet the perfect nature of the Father; we
have that combination in Christ.
We must
be careful not say that Christ started life with a clean slate nature and struggled
to avoid sin lest He would fall under His Father’s wrath but it was a struggle
and almost lost it a few times. Christ
is sinless because He was possessed and made up of the Father’s holy
nature. And it was so intrinsically part
of His being that while the enemy tried to tempt Him He could not sin because
it would go against His very nature. In
the Bible there is no evidence that Christ even thought about sinning. Christ is the physical and evidential human
proof of God’s impeccability because as the Lord Jesus says “the Father and I
are One.” So let us look at the proof
that Christ and thus God is perfect.
Well let’s go right back to the beginning, no not Genesis-too far, I am
leaving lets leaf through the pages of time to just over 2000 years ago,
roughly 2040 years ago-in Galilee, Nazareth should be good. This farm girl is sitting, resting from her
day’s work. And an angel comes to herald
good news of great joy. The Holy
(perfect) Spirit of the Most High will come upon her and overshadow her. In the gospel of Luke the angel calls the Christ
growing in the Virgin’s womb a “Holy thing”.
This should not be surprising since the Son of God must be holy since He
is holy. A son will always have the
attributes of their parents-why should the Son of God be any different and
since He is perfect and claims to be from God as the angels confirmed then
logic dictates God is perfect. But what
evidence do we have of the impeccability of Christ’s character during His adult
life?
The
perfection of Christ has been one of the most hotly debated topics in theology
since the Lord’s ministry. But one of
the most powerful passages Jesus claims His own impeccability without putting
Himself about the Father is in John 14:30; “Hereafter
I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath
nothing in me.” Jesus says plainly
and humbly that Satan, the root of evil has nothing in Him or near Him so thus
He has no sin. Earlier in the gospel of
John Christ is so sure of His impeccability He challenges people to find one
iota of sin in His life. He lays it out
in the open as He did throughout His entire ministry; but He did the same with
human beings. “Let he who is without sin
cast the first stone.” Jesus put Himself
on our level and as such He said since my life and all my personal little
moments are open to you, yours are open to Me.
Another proof of His perfection is the fact that Christ did not suffer
illness, physical or mental. Illness is
a result of man’s fall from grace as is death and Christ did not taste either
naturally. Medical researchers say that
based on the information at hand and historic analysis Christ should have died
from His injuries and blood loss hours before.
The final point I would like to look at is how God through Christ’s
perfection is cause for extreme joy for us.
One of
the core arguments people give for not accepting God’s gift is because they
claim that they hate the thought of being judged and they feel extreme pressure
because God is perfect they would feel more comfortable with a deity who can connect
more to what they are going through.
This would be a valid argument if Christ did not come but the fact that
Christ, came, ministered, died and rose again.
In 2nd Corinthians 5 verse 12 it says “For he (God) hath made Him (Christ) to be sin
for us, who (Christ) knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of
God in Him.” One of the most obvious examples of
Christ’s impeccability in that famous event, His temptation by Satan in the
desert. And this brings me to my third
point, why His perfection is cause for joy on our part. The purpose of Christ being tempted in the
desert was not as some people believe purification but a necessary part of His
incarnation, the same way He was cold, or hungry, or had His hair grow. But the reason we should cheer at His
perfection is that Christ overcoming temptation blots out an error from the
beginning of time. The last Adam did
what the first Adam could not. Jesus
Christ has often been referred to as the Last Adam both Him and the first Adam
are direct sons of God, one being completely human and a clear failure and the
other the older, perfect brother. Dr.
John McCormick summed it up best;
“The First Adam was tempted in a beautiful
garden, and fell in utter defeat. The Last Adam was tempted in a barren
wilderness, and was victorious. The
First Adam was given a “helpmate” to strengthen and encourage him. The Last
Adam stood alone. The First Adam was not
tempted directly by Satan, for his inducement to sin came from the very one who
was appointed to be his helpmate. The Last Adam was tempted directly by Satan. The First Adam’s defeat brought guilt and
condemnation to all his posterity. The Last Adam’s victory brought grace and
cleansing to all His posterity. Thank
God, He who faced the Tempter in the wilderness was no mailed soldier with a
toy shield defending Himself against paper arrows! He was the Last Adam,
standing in the position of being the federal head of a new race, and winning
for them the victory over the Tempter from the very beginning of their new
existence!”
The entire premise of this sermon is that God
is perfect but above that God is perfect and we should be grateful. This can be summed up finally and wholly in
Hebrews 2:10, 14-18; “10 For it was fitting that he,
for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should
make the founder of their salvation perfect through suffering... 14 Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself
likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the
one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and deliver
all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery. 16 for
surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of Abraham. 17
Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that
he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to
make propitiation for the sins of the people. 18 For because he
himself has suffered when tempted, he is able to help those who are being
tempted.”
In each of these sermons we
could analyze for years and write novels expounding on one topic. When I start writing these sermons I always
need to reign myself in and refocus myself.
But fortunately that is not hard, the question I always ask myself to
refocus is, how does this point to the supremacy of Christ? God is perfect, that really was never in
doubt, but the reason people doubt Christ is because He is a man. He is a perfect man, no; He is a perfect Son
of God sent to erase the imperfection of a fallen species descended from
another son of God-that is the joy of Christ’s impeccability. May the Lord bless you this week, may He make
His face to shine upon you and grant you peace.
May the Lord bless you and keep you.
Friday, 12 April 2013
The Impassibility of God
Even before the medieval church theologians’ became established ancient church fathers both from western and eastern systems agreed on impassibility before the schism. One of the earliest fathers happened to be one of the biggest anti theologians out there, his name was Tertullian. He also agreed that God was without suffering and passions. One of the tenets of impassibility is the one we focus on as the primary tenet of impassibility; God is not controlled by emotions or swayed by moods but is does not mean He is devoid of emotion; God is passionate but also impassable. How is this possible? We will look at this in several parts. We know of the Biblical references of God’s love and wrath but will have to dig deeper to look at impassibility.
Firstly, the language and grammar of God utilises the device known as “anthropopathisms”: This is defined that God does not experience emotions as we do and the closest thing we can describe to what God experiences is the emotions that we associate with. God does say His thoughts are not our thoughts and His ways are not our ways. We can all agree I believe that even if God has literal emotions as we do, His emotions are still a very different concept than emotions to us. The anthropopathism extends to God’s physical nature. The Holy Bible frequently references the eyes, ears, hands, and face of the Lord and that God made us in His image and yet the Bible clearly states that He does not have form; so the question is image of what? Another question to consider is what were our emotions like before the fall of man?
Secondly, in the previous sermon I spoke on the immutability of God. Immutability and impassibility are not separable. You cannot have a being that is unchangeable and also swayed by emotion and their responses to external forces. See as David Schrock said, “As a being of perfect character and temperament, his emotions are not swayed by the events of history. As a covenantal God, he blesses and curses, loves justice and hates sin, forgives and judges, but his holy attributes are not moody or manipulated. Though Christ, in his human nature learned obedience and suffered in the flesh (Heb 2:9-10), the divine nature of God never did.”
This brings me to my third and final point and probably my most important; God’s impassibility is demonstrated in the crucifixion of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. Scholars and lay people may think that Christ was the example of how God is NOT impassible; but I believe they are incorrect. Firstly let us jump to the garden of Gethsemane (Luke 22:42) “Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” Christ right there demonstrates that even though His human nature feels fear His divine nature is in line with the Father and will not be moved by that fear. Let us flashback to the early days of the ministry. Jesus and the disciples are at a wedding, they are out of wine and Mary takes the problem to her Son and what is His response. Woman, My time has not yet come! He is not swayed even in His miracles! Praise God! Could you imagine if Christ got rubbed the wrong way and took back one of His miracles?!? I know this sermon has been short and sort of rushed to up to this point but in this attributes series sermons there is so much it is best to give a basic underlying foundation and then encourage the online parishioner to go and search for themselves as well. But with this impassibility of God I really want to focus on Christ.
Let’s turn in our Bibles, phones, whatever to the New Testament, Matthew 26:37-38, “My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death. Stay here and keep watch with me.” See this conversation Jesus has with His discipline in the garden shows His suffering in Spirit, we know He suffered in body because aside from the crucifixion it says He sweat blood, it says He was hungry, and the Bible says He was subject to all the natures of man save one, sin. So we can draw one of two conclusions from this, first of all, Christ was not the Son of God but a man, or secondly that Christ is evidence of God’s impassable nature living in a human nature in perfect harmony. As I said before in an earlier sermon this is called a hypostatic union, the two natures living in divine harmony inside the being of Jesus. Many Christian theologians in the past and some in the not so distant past have subscribed to the idea that Christ only felt sorrow and no joy and they had often used that as an excuse to rob people of their joy; to create sombre, solemn, almost stoic followers but this was also a danger too because of the realm of impassibility. What I mean is that when we view Christ as detached, we belittle the very reason He became man. As a different being God could not put Himself in our shoes but with the nature of Christ the essence of God was able to exist in both. Now this comes to the evangelistic point in my sermon. In my travels through Europe, India, China, and many more places I have encountered the biggest opposition to my beliefs when I met with other members of an Abrahamic faith. Many believe that it is a sin to think God could feel anything for us or to even lower Himself to human existence. Why? We were created in God’s image! We were given needs and wants, God desires a relationship with us, He doesn’t need it, but desires it for our benefit and yet if we reject Him while He will not be pleased it will not affect His existence. See we have everything to lose if we do not accept God’s gift and everything to gain if we do; so in summing up here.
I am a firm believer in the impassibility of God. I do not believe it is a contradiction; I do not believe God is a god influenced like those of stone and wood. However I do believe God is a God who is aware of His creation and He is impassable and is so in the following ways:
1) His emotions may be different from what we call or perceive as emotions.
2) God is immutable (unchanging) so His impassibility is connected with that, most philosophers in ancient society do not even separate the two.
3) God’s impassibility is demonstrated in Christ’s unswerving response, nature, and being, and love.
For some this sermon may be confusing and others it may be too short. I apologise for both. This and the one before it were probably the most difficult attributes in this series I have had to deal with. But growth is good; we meet obstacles, respond to them, and grow from this. Thank God we have a God that does not go through that but is perfectly impassable thus able to guide the way. Our next sermon will be a continuation in this series focussing on God’s impeccability; stay tuned. So let me finish off with the benediction: “Be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.” Romans 12:2
Thursday, 28 March 2013
The Immutability of God
We continue in our 6th sermon in the series of the attributes of God. We took a brief pause to look at a couple of sermons on the book of James before other ministers took over the series and so we continue on with what I feel is a VERY important series but also a very difficult one. This is a time of lent as I write this. Lent to Christians, not just Catholics is about penance, sacrifice, abstinence, fasting, alms giving, purification, and deep spiritual devotion and reflection demonstrated by increased prayer, focus on God, increased church attendance, and association with Christ through self-imposed restrictions. Today we are looking at the immutability of God. In other words, the changeless and immovable nature God. In effect this is God’s PRIME attribute because of all of His others stems from this one. God is essentially according to one of the Anglican cardinals of faith “a spirit, whose being, wisdom power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth are infinite, eternal, and unchangeable.” When I was a child I loved and still do, learning about sharks. One I’m particularly interested-the great white shark. I remember watching “Jaws” as a child with my father, truly I remember doing many things with my father and in that time it was not only as father and son but also a chance for a father to teach his son about the world around him, and this was no different. I remember sitting on the couch and we were watching Jaws, and I was not frightened in the traditional sense; it was more so a fear in the same way I fear the sun or God; it is a fear of something that is greater than me, something that I should respect. As I watched in awe,
I asked about what ancient sharks looked like and was surprised to find out that the great white is in fact perfect. It has had no need to evolve. It has had no need to evolve. I stand in awe as well but in a VERY different way when it comes to an immutable God. God is infinite, and as an infinite God cannot be ever changing. I don’t struggle personally with the concept of God never ending but I do struggle with the concept of a being that never began and has not changed. It is not because I don’t believe that He is immutable but it is the fact that my pathetic human brain cannot handle it. There are dozens of Bible verses that support this attribute of God, some of them are listed: Num. 23:19; 1 Sam. 15:29; Ps. 102:26; Mal. 3:6; 2 Tim. 2:13; Heb. 6:17–18; Jam. 1:17. There is one text that stands out to me as evidence of God’s immutability, “He who is the Glory of Israel does not lie or change his mind; for he is not a human being, that he should change his mind.” 1 SAM 15:29. But the traditional view of God’s immutability is characterised with the following precepts:
1) God is unchanging; He is not affected by anything or is swayed in any way, shape, form, or prayers.
2) God is without emotion and is not reliant upon an outside force to change His mood.
3) He needs nothings, desires nothing, and His immutable nature is connected to all other parts of His nature.
4) Nothing we could do could ever sways Him or makes Him take notice of us because that would imply that He was not aware of us before.
But there is another side of the coin, which is called the more open view of God’s immutability; or for lack of a better term a “mutable” God. This is a God who is swayed by our emotions, a God who feels anger and compassion and can be swayed by our prayers and our offerings can gain His favour. But wait this does not sound right either? This is a view that God sent Christ down as a permanent solution to a problem God did not see coming (the fall of man). I’m confused because I know the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is not an unfeeling entity who does not even know or care about me. Even more in the Bible than God’s immutability is mentioned about God’s love. At the same time though I do not worship a God who can be swayed and overwhelmed by the needs of the world that He did not see. So which body of thought actually represents the true nature of God? It is the first, God IS an immutable God! The issue lies in how we view Him, understand scriptures, and ponder on His nature. So we will be looking at how these two conflicting views focus to one. God is unchanging, in Malachi He tells Israel that because God is unchanging and remembers His covenant promises they have not been destroyed.
See brothers and sisters we have been defining God as an immutable God by our philosophical definitions. In fact the very concept of an immutable deity was first presented by Plato and Pliny. We need to understand God’s immutability in the terms of the Holy Bible. And so according to the Bible what are God’s immutable characteristics:
- God cannot change His actions. Numbers 23:19 – “God is not a man, that He should lie, nor a son of man, that He should repent.” God does not break His promises; but it does not mean God is inflexible. God has never once been this inflexible rule breaker but at the same time He was never been a reactive God always trying to think up different behaviour strategies to correct our sin like some cosmic head master.
- God does not change in His nature. Psalms 102:26 – “They shall perish, but thou shalt endure; yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment; as vesture shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed.” He was and is and is to come. God does not age, or grow, or evolve in knowledge or physical nature. He does not exist in our time but does not exist of it; he occupies all things in all ways and as such all things have come from Him He does not need to change because if He did it would not make Him God and then our faith would not matter anyways.
- God’s third immutable characteristic is that He does change in His reaction to sin. Christ was always meant to come down. Adam and Eve were always going to sin. It seems to us that God reacts to us and puts plans into place. This is not the case, when God comes to Noah and says oh I am going to wipe out the world and start clean; this wasn’t a recent thing but rather a plan set out that when it came time in human standards to execute this plan He did. In Genesis 18 Abraham pleads with God for the lives of the people in Sodom and Gomorrah begging to begin with 50 people will save the city then it eventually whittles down to 10. This is not Abraham convincing or moving God to change His plans but it is in fact a chance for God to demonstrate that He has mercy on the wicked city on earth; and this is carried over to a wicked generation and Christ’s salvations, that generation is us.
How is Christ a demonstration of God’s immutability? People would say that Christ is proof that either God is either mutable or Christ is not the essence of God in flesh. However like with all of God’s attributes and His nature at times it seems contradictory to us but with all His attributes what we may view as contradictory they are in perfect harmony. It is called a hypostatic union; “In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God… 14 and the word became flesh and dwelt among us…” (John 1:1, 14). Both natures co-exist separately but temporarily in perfect harmony, adding flesh to a divine nature does not change the already divine nature. Jesus was not a god-man; like a demi god from Greek mythology; these two natures are in communication with one another and both natures are connected to the single person; this is called “communication idiomatum” which means that both natures are in perfect communion in the being of Christ. In John it says; “and now, glorify Thou Me together with Thyself, Father, with the glory which I had with Thee before the world was.” Paul says that in Him all the deity dwells in bodily form.
Theology is good and it is important but what good is knowledge if we do not do something with it. What applications can we take to live in fullness in Christ for all time?
- We can live knowing that the expectations of God for us have been the same, are the same, and will be the same. As a teacher I can tell you that students respond the best when a teacher is consistent in their behaviour and learning expectations for them.
- God’s emotions do not change; God loves us now; He always did, and always will. When a person is lost to hell God does not stop loving them, and He will love and lament their choice for all time.
- The promises we have in Christ written in the Bible are complete! There is no hidden book or secret code that will throw us for a loop.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)